The Origin of the Word “Condom”

There are three commonly given explanations for the origin of the word condom.


Although none of them have any significant supporting evidence and all three must be classified as mere speculation:

  • It is named after the village of Condom in southern France. This hypothesis was first proposed in 1904. Other than the similarity in form and the general English association with all things erotic to France, there is nothing to suggest that this is in fact the origin.

  • It is from the Latin condus, meaning that which preserves, a reference to the device’s original use for preventing syphilis.

  • It is from the Persian kondü or kendü, an earthen vessel for storing grain. This is a reference to the sheath’s function as a receptacle for semen. It supposedly made its way into English via Greek and Latin.

However, there is a more common, but likely false, tale about condom’s origin. Legend has it that the condom was named for its inventor, a British physician who lived during the reign of Charles II (1660-85). There is no evidence that such a Dr. Condom existed, but that has not stopped the spread of the legend.

The hunt is made difficult by the early variations in spelling (quondam, condon, etc.) and the fact that respectable dictionaries did not include such words until very recently. The Oxford English Dictionary, for example, did not include condom until its 1972 supplement even though there is an 1888 letter to James Murray, that venerable dictionary’s most famous editor, containing the earliest known citation of the term’s use.

This first known use of the term is in a 1705 letter referring to John Campbell, the 2nd Duke of Argyll, who traveled from London to Edinburgh bringing with him a:

 Certaine instrument called a Quondam, qch. occasioned ye debauching of a great number of Ladies of qualitie, and oyr young gentlewomen.

“Qunondam” is totally “condom” in the phonetic sense, but does this really count?  William E. Kruck seems to think so in his book “Looking For Docotor Condom” which inspired this article.  I recommend checking it out, but it won’t make this mystery any clearer.  Will the real condom namer please stand up?

More articles from the Condom Information Center:

The Joys of Summer Sex

It’s the one thing hotter than the weather these days – sultry summer sex. You can all but fan yourself (among other things) thinking about it. But what is it about the summer season that makes us so much more aroused? There are a number of reasons summertime awakens one’s libido. Males, in particular, respond […]


Durex Commercial Reminds Men That Kids Suck & Condoms Don’t

Hey guys! If you’ve ever been unsure whether or not you should use a condom, Durex has released a new commercial that will reinforce why condoms are seriously necessary. Durex’s “Protect Yourself” ad was recently named Spec Ad of the Year by the Association of Independent Commercial Producers. And after watching all of the video’s glorious […]


New York’s Condom Problem: Update

In the latest, “No duh,” news, New York is reconsidering their stance on condoms, which we wrote about just under a year ago. Basically, condoms could be used as evidence in prostitution cases– if you were caught carrying condoms, and you fit the profile of a sex worker. The NYPD reasoning behind this? You were […]

About Wallace

Wallace Fajardo adds the “oblivious male” perspective to the Condom Information Center with sly wit and an eagerness to learn.